Harm or Humor: A Multimodal, Multilingual Benchmark for Overt and Covert Harmful Humor

Abstract

Dark humor often relies on subtle cultural nuances and implicit cues that require contextual reasoning to interpret, posing safety challenges that current static benchmarks fail to capture. To address this, we introduce a novel multimodal, multilingual benchmark for detecting and understanding harmful and offensive humor. Our manually curated dataset comprises 3,000 texts and 6,000 images in English and Arabic, alongside 1,200 videos that span English, Arabic, and language-independent (universal) contexts. Unlike standard toxicity datasets, we enforce a strict annotation guideline: distinguishing \emph{Safe} jokes from \emph{Harmful} ones, with the latter further classified into \emph{Explicit} (overt) and \emph{Implicit} (Covert) categories to probe deep reasoning. We systematically evaluate state-of-the-art (SOTA) open and closed-source models across all modalities. Our findings reveal that closed-source models significantly outperform open-source ones, with a notable difference in performance between the English and Arabic languages in both, underscoring the critical need for culturally grounded, reasoning-aware safety alignment. \textcolor{red}{Warning: this paper contains example data that may be offensive, harmful, or biased.}